domain-model

To align domain terminology during a design review, stress-test your project plan against the existing domain model to surface terminology gaps. This guided grilling session refines language by removing ambiguity between domain concepts and implementation names.

Updating CONTEXT.md and ADRs inline as decisions crystallize ensures terminology consistency across the codebase. This process captures rationale and constraints during design reviews to directly guide future implementation work.

You need to stress-test a project plan against a domain model during design reviews, ADR drafting, and CONTEXT updates. This grilling session surfaces terminology gaps and aligns language with documented project decisions.

Capturing decision rationale during ADR drafting improves terminology consistency by tracing constraints and aligning domain language with implementation names. This ensures that crystallized decisions are directly reflected in live edits and repository documentation.

Yes, you can use a domain model grilling session to remove ambiguity between domain concepts and codebase terms. It refines terminology by closely integrating with repository docs like CONTEXT.md and ADRs to enforce alignment.

Relying solely on inline documentation updates for term alignment requires close integration with live edits and repository docs. Without a guided grilling session to stress-test plans, terminology gaps may persist uncaught during design reviews.