dot-ai-write-docs

Write documentation from validated setup steps and real command outputs.

3|1|Updated Mar 1, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/vfarcic/dot-ai-headlamp --skill dot-ai-write-docs
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: dot-ai-write-docs
Source: https://github.com/vfarcic/dot-ai-headlamp/tree/main/.claude/skills/dot-ai-write-docs
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/vfarcic/dot-ai-headlamp --skill dot-ai-write-docs

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps produce accurate, user-focused documentation that is grounded in real behavior instead of guessed examples. It is designed to keep docs trustworthy by validating setup steps and capturing actual output before writing.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Real-example documentation: Verifies commands and user-facing interactions before describing them.
  • Chunked drafting workflow: Writes one section at a time so each part can be reviewed and corrected early.
  • Validation-first setup: Checks that existing setup instructions work before documenting them.
  • Use case: A maintainer can use this Skill to create or update a setup guide, feature guide, or API reference without inventing outputs or skipping verification.

Quick Start

Ask the Skill to help you write or update a document, then follow its instructions to validate the workflow and collect real outputs before it drafts each section.

Frequently Asked Questions about dot-ai-write-docs

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I write technical documentation with verified real command output?

Writing technical documentation with verified real command output requires validating setup steps and capturing actual MCP or shell outputs before drafting prose. This approach ensures docs reflect real user-facing workflows instead of invented examples.

How do I update API references without guessing command outputs?

Updating API references without guessing requires executing setup validation and collecting real MCP or shell outputs first. The documentation is then drafted chunk by chunk, ensuring each section reflects actual command behavior before prose is written.

What is the best way to create setup guides that match real user-facing workflows?

Creating setup guides that match real user-facing workflows involves a validation-first approach where existing setup instructions are checked for accuracy. Real outputs are captured, and chunked drafting writes one section at a time for early review.

Can I draft new feature guides section by section to catch errors early?

Drafting new feature guides section by section allows each chunk to be reviewed and corrected early in the process. This workflow requires executed setup validation and real MCP or shell outputs before any prose is written for the guide.

Does this documentation approach work for major doc updates and new feature guides?

This documentation approach works for major doc updates, new feature guides, setup instructions, and API references. It applies validation-first setup and chunk-by-chunk drafting to ensure all updates reflect real command output and verified workflows.