dotnet-mcaf-nfr

Measurable non-functional requirements are generated by translating vague quality-attribute goals like scalability and reliability into explicit, testable criteria linked to feature documentation and ADRs. This produces verification artifacts for architecture reviews.

Documenting quality attribute trade-offs involves proposing concrete non-functional requirements mapped directly to measurable validation criteria and tests. This captures explicit architecture decisions regarding accessibility, performance, and maintainability.

Mapping NFRs to a verification plan requires linking each defined quality attribute to specific tests and review processes. This generates reusable artifacts that accelerate evaluating architecture changes across design, development, and QA.

Yes, you can sync documentation with explicit NFRs by running this process on existing feature or architecture docs. It generates explicit non-functional requirements, documentation links, and verification artifacts to align design, development, and QA.

Defining explicit quality attributes is needed when a feature change requires clear trade-offs among accessibility, reliability, scalability, or compliance. Capturing these non-functional requirements ensures architecture refactors maintain measurable quality standards.