What problem does it solve? Reviewing a contract before signing is hard for non-lawyers: it is easy to miss unlimited liability clauses, inconsistent amounts between the main contract and attachments, or one-sided termination rights. This Skill produces a structured contract review that separates must-fix risks from negotiable improvements and minor formalities, with ready-to-use replacement text. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Position-aware review: Confirms which party the user represents first, so suggestions never weaken clauses that already favor the user. - Module-based risk detection: Reviews by transaction modules (payment, delivery/acceptance, liability, termination, confidentiality, IP, data privacy, SLA) rather than contract titles, covering 13 module types. - Three-tier output: Classifies findings into must-fix risks, negotiable optimizations, and formal completion items, each with location, risk level, rationale, and copy-paste revision text. - DOCX precheck script: A standard-library-only Python script extracts paragraphs, tables, comments, amounts, dates, blank fields, attachments, and cross-reference clues from .docx contracts as factual input for the review. - Use Case: A user uploads a SaaS service agreement and asks whether it is safe to sign; the Skill identifies the user's side, flags an unlimited indemnity clause as a must-fix risk with replacement wording, lists a perpetual confidentiality term as negotiable, and groups blank signature fields as formalities. ## Quick Start Upload your contract file and ask the assistant to review it from your party's perspective, stating whether you are the buyer, seller, or service provider.
