doubt-driven-development

Review code changes by validating non-obvious assumptions with peer collaboration.

Updated Dec 18, 2021

Search Tags:#code review #development workflow #risk management #assumption testing #peer review

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/isihigameKoudai/utils --skill doubt-driven-development-isihigamekoudai

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: doubt-driven-development
Source: https://github.com/isihigameKoudai/utils/tree/main/.agents/skills/doubt-driven-development
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/isihigameKoudai/utils --skill doubt-driven-development-isihigamekoudai

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill encourages questioning assumptions in code changes, preventing premature validation of decisions, and helps in identifying potential issues early in the development process.

Core Features & Use Cases

Assumption Validation: Ensures non-obvious decisions are tested in a fresh context before adoption.
Early Error Detection: Helps in catching errors before they become costly issues.
Use Case: When making a significant change to an unfamiliar codebase or feature, use this Skill to question assumptions and validate the change through thorough reviews.

Quick Start

Apply the doubt-driven-development skill to validate changes in the 'src/features/Noise/' directory.

Frequently Asked Questions about doubt-driven-development

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I validate non-obvious decisions in code changes before merging?▼

Assumption testing in development workflow involves applying a structured review process to validate non-obvious decisions in code changes, utilizing external peer reviews and criteria-based validation to catch errors early before they become costly issues.

How do I catch potential issues early when modifying an unfamiliar codebase?▼

To catch potential issues early when modifying an unfamiliar codebase, use a structured review process to question assumptions, test non-obvious decisions in a fresh context, and collaborate with peers for manual code inspection.

What is the best way to test assumptions during a development workflow?▼

The best way to test assumptions during a development workflow is to apply a structured review process that requires manual code inspection, external peer collaboration, and criteria-based validation of non-obvious decisions in a fresh context to prevent premature validation.

Does peer review work for identifying risks in significant codebase changes?▼

Peer review effectively identifies risks in significant codebase changes by validating non-obvious decisions through external reviews and criteria-based testing, ensuring changes are thoroughly inspected in a fresh context before adoption.

When should I not use assumption testing in code review?▼

Assumption testing in code review should be avoided for changes that do not involve non-obvious decisions or significant modifications to unfamiliar features, as the structured peer review process requires manual inspection and collaboration that may be unnecessary for trivial updates.