What problem does it solve? Confident answers are not always correct ones, and long sessions quietly turn assumptions into facts. This Skill prevents costly mistakes by forcing every non-trivial decision through an adversarial fresh-context review while course-correction is still cheap. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Five-Step Doubt Cycle: A bounded CLAIM, EXTRACT, DOUBT, RECONCILE, STOP loop that isolates the smallest reviewable artifact and contract, then cross-examines it with an adversarial prompt. - Cross-Model Escalation: Optionally routes the artifact and contract to external CLIs like Gemini or Codex in read-only sandboxes to catch single-model blind spots, with explicit user authorization each time. - Structured Reconciliation: Classifies every reviewer finding as contract misread, actionable, trade-off, or noise, with a hard stop after three cycles. - Use Case: Before committing a new caching layer claimed to be thread-safe, extract the diff and its contract, spawn a fresh-context reviewer instructed to find issues, reconcile the findings, and only then proceed. ## Quick Start Apply doubt-driven development to the architectural decision I am about to make and cross-examine it with a fresh-context adversarial review before I commit.
