doubt-driven-development

Review code with an adversarial mindset using structured prompts and finding classification.

Updated May 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/soloamente/still --skill doubt-driven-development-soloamente
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: doubt-driven-development
Source: https://github.com/soloamente/still/tree/main/.cursor/skills/doubt-driven-development
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/soloamente/still --skill doubt-driven-development-soloamente

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill fosters a mindset that prioritizes correctness and thorough review over rapid development, particularly in high-stakes or unfamiliar code scenarios.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Adversarial Code Review: Encourages a fresh, skeptical perspective on every non-trivial code decision.
  • Decision Analysis: Provides a structured framework for reviewing and challenging assumptions.
  • Use Case: Before deploying a critical update, use this Skill to ensure that each decision is thoroughly vetted, reducing the risk of production errors.

Quick Start

Initiate a doubt-driven development cycle for a new feature by following the provided checklist.

Frequently Asked Questions about doubt-driven-development

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is adversarial code review and how does it validate correctness?

Adversarial code review analyzes code decisions by adopting a skeptical mindset to challenge assumptions. It classifies findings using structured review prompts, ensuring correctness over speed in high-stakes development scenarios.

How do I perform an adversarial code review before deployment?

To perform an adversarial code review, initiate a doubt-driven development cycle using a provided checklist of structured review prompts. This process systematically challenges non-trivial code decisions and classifies the findings.

Does this approach work for reviewing unfamiliar code scenarios?

Yes, doubt-driven development is specifically applicable for unfamiliar code scenarios where correctness is paramount. It encourages developers to approach every non-trivial decision with a fresh, skeptical perspective.

How does adversarial review differ from standard code analysis?

Adversarial review prioritizes correctness over speed by actively challenging assumptions, unlike standard code analysis. It provides a structured framework to classify findings rather than simply scanning for syntax or style issues.

When should I prioritize decision validation over rapid development?

You should prioritize decision validation over rapid development in high-stakes scenarios or when working with unfamiliar code. This ensures every non-trivial code decision is thoroughly vetted before deployment.