dpa-review

To review a Data Processing Agreement against your playbook, attach the DPA document and trigger the review. The Skill loads your configured playbook positions and runs a term-by-term consistency check to identify clause gaps.

DPA review detects processor versus controller stance by evaluating the document direction. It treats the review as defensive if you are the processor or protective if you are the controller, and prompts for clarification if the direction is ambiguous.

Yes, you can check if your DPA contradicts your privacy policy commitments. The review runs a privacy policy consistency check to flag mismatches between the DPA commitments and your configured privacy policy to prevent contradictory terms.

The best way to generate negotiation-ready redlines is running a playbook-driven term-by-term review. The process compares clauses in areas like subprocessing, security, and international transfers, outputting consolidated redlines and a prioritized risk summary.

Yes, DPA review covers international data transfer clauses. The term-by-term consistency check specifically flags gaps in international transfers alongside other key privacy-control areas like audit rights, breach notice, and liability.

You need to clarify the direction of a data processing addendum when the processor versus controller relationship is ambiguous. Without clarification, the Skill cannot accurately determine whether to apply a defensive or protective review posture.