skills.rest
wen-chen
wen-chenCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
Website𝕏@Harold_W_ChenGitHub

dr-cook:paper-reviewer

Generate mode-appropriate manuscript reviews with six-dimension checklists or seven-section referee reports.

7|1|Updated Mar 9, 2026
Search Tags:#peer-review#literature-review#academic-writing#review-checklist#manuscripts#referee-report
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/wen-chen/dr-cook --skill dr-cook-paper-reviewer
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: dr-cook:paper-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/wen-chen/dr-cook/tree/main/modules/review/paper-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/wen-chen/dr-cook --skill dr-cook-paper-reviewer

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Manuscript reviews are time-consuming and inconsistently structured; this Skill provides a systematic, mode-aware review framework to generate actionable feedback for authors and editors.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Self-review mode: produces a six-dimension checklist-style evaluation suitable for pre-submission checks.
  • Peer-review mode: produces a formal seven-section referee report including an editorial recommendation.
  • Auto-detection: the system infers mode from user input phrases and outputs the corresponding report format.

Quick Start

Provide the manuscript text and trigger phrases to auto-detect the mode and generate the appropriate review output.

Frequently Asked Questions about dr-cook:paper-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generate a structured peer-review report for an academic manuscript?▼

Generate a structured peer review by providing manuscript text to produce a formal seven-section referee report with an editorial recommendation. The system auto-detects peer-review mode from trigger phrases.

What is the best way to run a pre-submission self-review on my manuscript?▼

Run a pre-submission self-review by inputting your manuscript text to receive a six-dimension checklist evaluation. The system detects self-review mode from input phrases and outputs the checklist format.

Can I use this manuscript review tool for different academic domains?▼

Yes, you can use this manuscript review tool across various academic domains. It supports both self-review and peer-review workflows, generating mode-appropriate feedback regardless of the specific field.

How does the system know whether to output a referee report or a self-review checklist?▼

The system auto-detects the active mode from user input phrases. It infers whether to deliver a six-dimension checklist for self-review or a seven-section referee report for peer-review.

What sections are included in a formal referee report generated from a manuscript?▼

A formal referee report includes seven distinct sections and concludes with an editorial recommendation. This structured format ensures systematic feedback for editors and authors during peer review.

What dimensions are evaluated during a manuscript self-review?▼

A manuscript self-review evaluates the text across six dimensions using a structured checklist. This systematic framework helps authors identify issues and generate actionable feedback before submission.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
dakesandakesan
2

scientific-writing

Generate IMRAD-structured scientific manuscripts with styled citations and reporting guidelines.

Community
Basic
Unified-Field-Theory-ResearchUnified-Field-Theory-Research

gpd-respond-to-referees

Generate structured responses to referee reports for scholarly manuscripts.

Official
Advanced
Zeyuyang-0420Zeyuyang-0420

citation-management

Generates validated BibTeX entries from Google Scholar and PubMed searches.

Community
Advanced
brainworkupbrainworkup
1

peer-review

Evaluate manuscripts with a checklist-driven peer-review workflow.

Community
Advanced