dry-monads-patterns

Standardize Rails service objects with dry-monads Success and Failure pipelines.

7|3|Updated May 25, 2015
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/rockcodelabs/kw-app --skill dry-monads-patterns
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: dry-monads-patterns
Source: https://github.com/rockcodelabs/kw-app/tree/main/.agents/skills/dry-monads-patterns
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/rockcodelabs/kw-app --skill dry-monads-patterns

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill standardizes the creation of service objects in kw-app by guiding the use of the dry-monads library to enforce explicit Success/Failure handling and do-notation, eliminating ad-hoc Result classes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Provides a consistent pattern for building service objects with Dry::Monads[:result, :do], enabling clean, predictable control flow.
  • Replaces deprecated custom Result, Success, and Failure classes with a unified approach.
  • Covers common workflows: single-step operations, multi-step pipelines, and multiple failure types within controllers.

Quick Start

Create a new operation under a module using Dry::Monads[:result, :do], implement a small multi-step workflow, and hook it into a controller action to handle Success and Failure in a user-friendly way.

Frequently Asked Questions about dry-monads-patterns

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I standardize error handling in Rails service objects?

Use do-notation in Rails service objects by integrating Dry::Monads[:result, :do]. This allows you to build multi-step pipelines where operations halt automatically on Failure, replacing custom Result classes with clean, predictable control flow for complex workflows.

What is the best way to replace custom Result classes in Ruby applications?

The best way to replace custom Result classes is adopting the dry-monads library to enforce explicit Success and Failure handling. This provides a unified approach across the codebase, eliminating deprecated ad-hoc implementations and standardizing service object return types.

Does dry-monads work with Rails controllers for multiple failure types?

Yes, dry-monads works with Rails controllers to handle multiple failure types. By integrating Dry::Monads[:result, :do], controllers can hook into service object pipelines and resolve Success and Failure outcomes in a user-friendly way without deep nested conditionals.

How do I build a multi-step workflow pipeline in Ruby using do-notation?

Build a multi-step workflow pipeline in Ruby by creating an operation under a module using Dry::Monads[:result, :do]. This pattern enables clean orchestration where sequential steps yield Success or Failure, automatically halting the pipeline if a step fails.

When do I need dry-monads for Rails service object architecture?

You need dry-monads for Rails service object architecture when ad-hoc Result classes create complexity and inconsistent error handling. It is applicable when building service objects that require predictable control flow for single-step or multi-step user workflows.

What are the limitations of using dry-monads do-notation in Ruby?

A limitation of using dry-monads do-notation in Ruby is that it requires the dry-monads gem and consistent adoption across the codebase to avoid mixing patterns. Service objects must strictly return Success or Failure to maintain the pipeline integrity.