ds-requesting-analysis-review

Request an independent methodological review of analytics results before publishing decisions.

6|Updated Apr 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Khodzitcky-Vl/data-science-ai-superpowers --skill ds-requesting-analysis-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ds-requesting-analysis-review
Source: https://github.com/Khodzitcky-Vl/data-science-ai-superpowers/tree/main/ds-requesting-analysis-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Khodzitcky-Vl/data-science-ai-superpowers --skill ds-requesting-analysis-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It prevents broken or decision-inappropriate analytics from hardening into business calls by getting an independent methodological review of design, statistics, interpretation, and reproducibility.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Decision-Stage Review: Requests review when results are close to decision-ready, after major studies, or before publishing recommendations.
  • Review Package Guidance: Specifies what to provide (question, unit, metrics and formulas, data windows/exclusions, validation level, notebooks/SQL, and exported outputs) so the reviewer can verify everything end to end.
  • Targeted Method Checks: Drives checks for unit alignment, metric stability/invariants, randomization correctness, statistical method suitability, sensitivity to tails/outliers, and reproducibility appropriate to the validation level.

Quick Start

Ask your AI assistant to dispatch an analysis-reviewer using your notebook path, SQL/query reference, and exported result tables, including your validation level and full review package.

Frequently Asked Questions about ds-requesting-analysis-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is an independent analysis review for experiment results?

An independent analysis review verifies the reproducibility of experiment design, statistical methods, metric definitions, and interpretation before final decision readiness. It checks randomization alignment, invariant signals, and sensitivity to outliers to prevent flawed analytics from hardening into business calls.

How do I request a methodological review for my notebook investigation?

To request an analysis review, provide a complete review package containing your question context, experiment unit, metric formulas, data windows, exclusions, validation level, and notebook or SQL artifact references. This allows an independent reviewer to verify your statistical methods end to end.

What should be included in a review package for metric validation?

A metric validation review package requires your study question, decision context, hypothesis, experiment unit, final metric formulas, data windows, exclusions, validation level, and exported output tables. These artifacts enable thorough checks for unit alignment, randomization correctness, and statistical method suitability.

Can I use this review process for methodology proposals before publishing?

Yes, methodology proposals require the same reproducibility verification as experiment analyses. You can request a decision-stage review to check statistical method correctness, sensitivity to tails, and invariant signals before your recommendations are published and finalized.

When do I need to check for SRM signals in experiment analysis?

Sample Ratio Mismatch (SRM) signals and invariant checks must be verified during an independent methodological review before decision readiness. Checking SRM ensures your randomization alignment is correct and your experiment design supports valid, reproducible statistical conclusions.