ds-review

Review data science analyses for methodology, reproducibility, and code quality.

19|5|Updated Jan 4, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/edwinhu/workflows --skill ds-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ds-review
Source: https://github.com/edwinhu/workflows/tree/main/lib/skills/ds-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/edwinhu/workflows --skill ds-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill rigorously reviews data analysis methodologies, code quality, and reproducibility to ensure the integrity and reliability of research-grade findings.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Parallel Review: Spawns specialized reviewers (Methodology, Reproducibility, Code Quality) for in-depth, multi-faceted analysis checks.
  • Reconciliation Protocol: Merges and prioritizes findings from multiple reviewers to produce a consolidated, actionable report.
  • Use Case: Before submitting a research paper, use this Skill to perform a comprehensive audit of the analysis code and methodology, ensuring it meets publication standards and is fully reproducible.

Quick Start

Initiate a parallel review of the current data analysis project.

Frequently Asked Questions about ds-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I audit data science analysis for reproducibility and methodology before publication?

To audit data science analysis for reproducibility, this Skill spawns parallel reviewers to validate methodology, code quality, and adherence to SPEC.md and PLAN.md, ensuring research-grade integrity for publication.

What is a multi-agent code review for research-grade data analysis?

A multi-agent code review uses specialized agents to evaluate methodology, reproducibility, and code quality simultaneously. It merges findings into a consolidated report to ensure data analysis meets high-stakes decision-making standards.

How do I ensure my data analysis code meets publication standards?

You ensure data analysis code meets publication standards by running a comprehensive audit that validates reproducibility and methodology against research-grade benchmarks, reconciling multi-agent findings into actionable feedback.

Do I need CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS to run a parallel methodology audit?

Yes, you need CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS enabled to execute the parallel review process, which spawns the specialized methodology, reproducibility, and code quality reviewers required for the audit.

Can I validate analysis code against SPEC.md and PLAN.md automatically?

Yes, you can automatically validate analysis code against SPEC.md and PLAN.md. The review process checks adherence to these specifications to guarantee the methodology meets research-grade publication requirements.

When should I use a reconciliation protocol for data science code review?

Use a reconciliation protocol when multiple specialized reviewers complete their audits. It merges and prioritizes parallel findings into a consolidated, actionable report for high-stakes decision-making or publication.