dspy-program-security

Identify and mitigate security risks in DSPy prompt programs and tool wrappers.

4|Updated Apr 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/maruakshay/mii-ai-security --skill dspy-program-security
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: dspy-program-security
Source: https://github.com/maruakshay/mii-ai-security/tree/main/skills/dspy-program-security
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/maruakshay/mii-ai-security --skill dspy-program-security

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

DSPy compiles your examples into prompts; if optimizer datasets or tool wrappers contain unsafe content, security gaps propagate into production prompts. This skill provides a structured review to identify and remediate unsafe signatures, data leakage from optimizer training, boundary violations between prompt programs and tooling, and enforcement of strict output typing.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Review module signatures, adapters, and prompt-program composition to ensure isolation and safe tool usage.
  • Enforce strict typed outputs and per-module tool allowlists to limit surface area for risk.
  • Establish a dataset curation pipeline to prevent insecure optimizer data from poisoning compiled prompts and deployed artifacts.
  • Perform a compiled-program review before deployment to detect injected content or misconfigurations.

Quick Start

Review a DSPy program's security posture by inspecting optimizer datasets, compiled prompts, and tool wrappers, and implement a strict review workflow.

Frequently Asked Questions about dspy-program-security

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I secure DSPy prompt programs against tool wrapper vulnerabilities?

Secure DSPy prompt programs by enforcing per-module tool allowlists and strict typed outputs. Reviewing module signatures, adapters, and prompt-program composition ensures isolation and limits the surface area for tool wrapper security risks.

What is the risk of insecure optimizer datasets in DSPy compiled programs?

Insecure optimizer datasets risk poisoning compiled prompts and deployed artifacts with unsafe content. Establishing a dataset curation pipeline prevents insecure optimizer data from propagating data leakage or injected content into production DSPy programs.

Do I need to enforce typed outputs for every DSPy module signature?

Enforcing strict typed outputs for every DSPy module signature is required to limit the surface area for risk. Typed outputs work alongside per-module tool allowlists to enforce isolation and safe tool usage during development and review.

What's the best way to review DSPy compiled programs before deployment?

The best way to review DSPy compiled programs before deployment is a structured compiled-program review process. Inspecting compiled prompts, optimizer datasets, and tool wrappers detects injected content, misconfigurations, and boundary violations between prompt programs and tooling.

Why does my DSPy compiled prompt contain unsafe content from the optimizer dataset?

DSPy compiled prompts contain unsafe content when optimizer datasets are not properly curated. If optimizer datasets or tool wrappers contain unsafe content, security gaps propagate into production prompts, requiring a dataset curation pipeline to prevent data leakage.

Can I use this approach to prevent boundary violations between DSPy modules and tooling?

You can prevent boundary violations between DSPy modules and tooling by reviewing module signatures and prompt-program composition. This approach ensures isolation and safe tool usage by enforcing per-module tool allowlists and strict typed outputs across datasets and compiled artifacts.