Run sequential Codex adversarial reviews of specs and plans.
npx skills add https://github.com/mrkhachaturov/rkstack --skill dual-review-mrkhachaturov
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: dual-review Source: https://github.com/mrkhachaturov/rkstack/tree/main/skills/dual-review Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mrkhachaturov/rkstack --skill dual-review-mrkhachaturov
Sequential Claude-Codex review loop that adversarially interrogates specs and plans to surface gaps, inconsistencies, and risk before implementation.
Invoke the skill on a target artifact using the /dual-review command to start the adversarial review loop.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Run an adversarial review on a project plan by invoking the /dual-review command, which orchestrates sequential Codex interrogations to surface gaps, conflicts, and risks. The loop iterates until approval or a maximum round limit is reached, outputting a structured JSON verdict.
Structured JSON output from a spec review is generated by running sequential adversarial review loops that conform to review-schema.json. This process validates specifications and plans, producing a structured JSON verdict and recommendations that enable automated triage and traceable document edits.
Yes, adversarial review loops can be embedded directly within brainstorming and writing-plans workflows to automatically run Codex reviews after self-review. This integration handles linked specs in plan mode and respects project conventions via detection caches.
Yes, the dual-review skill supports standalone invocation with configurable review rounds and an optional focus text. This allows you to target specific areas of an artifact during the adversarial review loop until the spec or plan is approved.
A key limitation of automated spec and plan reviews is that guidelines direct you to edit the documentation rather than the code. The review loop is constrained by a maximum round limit and focuses on surfacing risks in linked specs rather than generating code fixes.
sadie100Execute a requirement-to-implementation pipeline using sequential subagents for brainstorming, grilling, planning, and execution.
axiomanticIdentify and triage verifiable claims in code and documentation with evidence.
roderikDispatch fresh subagents per task to execute implementation plans with two-stage reviews.
LIDR-academyReview specifications and code changes for flaws, security gaps, and inconsistencies.
