Route high-stakes questions through three advisors for peer-reviewed verdicts.
npx skills add https://github.com/easingthemes/dx-aem-flow --skill dx-council
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: dx-council Source: https://github.com/easingthemes/dx-aem-flow/tree/main/plugins/dx-core/skills/dx-council Command: npx skills add https://github.com/easingthemes/dx-aem-flow --skill dx-council
The Council skill provides structured, multi-angle analysis for high-stakes questions, decisions, or artifacts by routing them through three independent AI advisors who peer-review each other and deliver a synthesized verdict, reducing risk and bias in complex decisions.
Submit a clearly defined, high-stakes question or artifact and request a council verdict.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
AI council decision analysis reduces bias by routing high-stakes product strategy through three independent advisors—a Critic, Architect, and Operator—who anonymously peer-review each other before a chairman synthesizes a final verdict.
To get a three-advisor verdict for critical architecture trade-offs, submit a clearly defined question or artifact to the council, which then coordinates independent analysis, anonymous peer-review, and final verdict synthesis.
Yes, you can use this council workflow for high-stakes product decisions. It applies to strategy planning, architecture choices, and implementation approaches, ensuring diverse perspectives and rigorous review for safer outcomes.
The best way to ensure traceability for complex decision analysis is generating a full council transcript. This saves the independent advisor analyses, anonymous peer-reviews, and final synthesized verdict for future reference and auditability.
Verdict synthesis requires multiple independent AI advisors to surface blind spots and alternatives. By analyzing the same input from distinct angles, they mitigate single-perspective bias and produce a more justified final decision.
Using a single LLM for critical trade-offs risks biased or incomplete decision-making. A three-advisor council mitigates this by forcing independent analysis and anonymous peer-review before synthesizing a final verdict.
harshitsinghbhandariOrchestrate five AI advisors with parallel reviews and a synthesized verdict.
CygnusfearDocument engineering decisions as ADRs with rationale and decision logs.
JamkrisConvene four independent voices to critique options and synthesize a verdict.
TakfesRun parallel AI advisor analysis with anonymous peer review and chairman synthesis.
