e2e-user-flows-check

Detect user interaction flows and align them with E2E tests to identify coverage gaps.

Updated Jun 1, 2024
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/gustavop-dev/projectapp --skill e2e-user-flows-check
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: e2e-user-flows-check
Source: https://github.com/gustavop-dev/projectapp/tree/main/.agents/skills/e2e-user-flows-check
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/gustavop-dev/projectapp --skill e2e-user-flows-check

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) and scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Identifies and verifies that all user interactions within a product are covered by End-to-End tests, preventing untested critical paths.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Flow Enumeration: Lists all existing user flows from documentation, UI routes, and backend endpoints.
  • Coverage Verification: Maps each customer journey to existing E2E test cases to identify gaps.
  • Prioritization: Separates critical flows from secondary ones and highlights missing coverage for risk mitigation.
  • Use Case: A QA team uses this to systematically review and enhance test coverage, ensuring vital user paths are validated.

Quick Start

Provide the project repository to the tool and initiate a comprehensive mapping of all user flows to confirm testing completeness.

Frequently Asked Questions about e2e-user-flows-check

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I identify untested critical paths in my E2E test coverage?

To identify untested critical paths in E2E test coverage, map all enumerated user interaction flows from documentation, UI routes, and backend endpoints against existing test scripts to systematically detect and report coverage gaps.

How do I map user flows to existing E2E tests to find missing scenarios?

You can map user flows to existing E2E tests by analyzing product documentation and backend endpoints to enumerate customer journeys, then aligning each journey with current test scripts to highlight missing scenarios.

What is the best way to prioritize E2E test coverage for critical user journeys?

Prioritizing E2E test coverage for critical user journeys involves separating critical flows from secondary ones during mapping, then highlighting missing coverage on important paths to mitigate product testing risks.

Can I verify E2E test completeness across product documentation and backend endpoints?

You can verify E2E test completeness across product documentation and backend endpoints by providing the project repository to initiate a comprehensive flow mapping that confirms testing integrity across all interaction paths.

Do I need existing test scripts to enumerate user interaction flows for QA automation?

You need existing test scripts to verify coverage, but user interaction flow enumeration itself works by analyzing UI routes, product documentation, and backend endpoints independently before aligning them with the tests.

Why does my E2E test mapping report secondary flows but miss critical user journeys?

E2E test mapping may miss critical user journeys if flow enumeration does not systematically separate critical paths from secondary ones, preventing effective prioritization and risk mitigation for untested interactions.