eagle-ux-review

To run a heuristic evaluation using screenshots, submit your images to receive a severity-rated UX audit. The review evaluates screens against 65+ UX laws to identify usability failures and outputs a prioritized fix plan in an HTML or Word report.

Video frame extraction for usability review captures frames at exhaustive 1-second intervals using ffmpeg. This process enables timing, hesitation, and transition analysis across end-to-end user journeys to produce structured severity findings tied to a north star metric.

Yes, you can validate implemented user flows against PRD success criteria. The review checks whether the implemented UX matches the intended flow and success criteria, identifying clarity, hierarchy, and progress signaling failures that prevent users from reaching the north star metric.

The UX audit supports both single screen and end-to-end journey analysis. It applies evidence-based evaluation across action clarity, information load, visual hierarchy, and responsiveness to generate actionable mockup recommendations and a structured fix plan.

A usability critique generates an HTML report by default, featuring embedded screenshots and mockup recommendations. An optional Word document format is also available for sharing the severity-ranked findings and prioritized fix plan.

Yes, ffmpeg and ffprobe are required to perform a video-based UX audit. These dependencies enable exhaustive 1-second frame extraction necessary for analyzing timing, hesitation, and transition behaviors in end-to-end user journeys.