eb1a-petition-narrative

To draft an EB-1A petition narrative, you provide petitioner details, select criteria, and run the workflow to map independent exhibits and enrich evidence for each claim.

EB-1A petition narratives require rigorous proof and stricter standards than O-1A, incorporating Phase 2 totality synthesis, intent to continue work, and substantial U.S. benefit sections.

You map exhibits by using a document index to structure arguments, applying evidence enrichment to support each EB-1A claim and prioritize criteria based on strength assessments.

Yes, you can apply optional tools like the case-strength-assessor and publication-citation-table to prioritize criteria and strengthen evidence for your EB-1A petition narrative.

You need the document index produced by document-summary-arrangement to provide the foundational structure for exhibit mapping and evidence enrichment in the EB-1A petition workflow.

Yes, the workflow includes Phase 2 Step 2 totality synthesis, intent to continue work, and substantial U.S. benefit sections to meet the rigorous EB-1A standards.