What problem does it solve?
This Skill evaluates proposed EDA experiments and flow changes to detect logically unsound assumptions, conflicts with known physics or policy, and high-risk comparisons before any expensive submission is run, preventing wasted resources and invalid results.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Theory-based vetoing: Parse a one-paragraph proposal into falsifiable assumptions and check them against physics, EDA constraints, local policy, and empirical evidence.
- Structured verdicts: Emit a single GO / CONDITIONAL / NO-GO verdict with numbered blocking reasons, an assumption table, and a minimal corrective experiment when needed.
- Enforcement integration: Produce machine-readable reports consumable by gate scripts to block or allow submissions and record override logs for audits.
- Use Case: Run this before launching large simulation batches, changing cost or objective models, or claiming algorithmic superiority to avoid invalid comparisons or policy violations.
Quick Start
Use the eda-theory-veto skill to evaluate my proposed experiment and return a GO, CONDITIONAL, or NO-GO verdict with evidence and a safe next step.