What problem does it solve?
Designing EEG paradigms that isolate specific ERP components requires expert knowledge about timing constraints, trial counts, subtraction control conditions, and artifact mitigation, and non-specialists often choose parameters that create ERP overlap or confounded sensory responses without realizing it.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Component-to-paradigm mapping that links each ERP signature (P1, N170, N2pc, P3b, N400, P600, MMN, ERN, LRP, CNV, SSVEP) to canonical designs, latency targets, and appropriate electrode montages.
- Timing and trial guidance covering ISI/SOA ranges, jitter strategies, epoch windows, and trial-count targets with built-in attrition buffers to deliver clean averages.
- Control subtraction design outlining matched stimuli, montage density, and checks for common pitfalls such as overlap, habituation, response confounds, and baseline contamination.
- Use case: plan an N400 sentence reading experiment or a P3b oddball study by locking in ISIs, montages, block structure, and artifact-resilient trial counts before data collection.
Quick Start
Ask the skill to design an EEG paradigm isolating your ERP component with validated timing, trial counts, and subtraction logic.