Analyze Elm test code for coverage gaps, edge cases, and quality.
npx skills add https://github.com/bromanko/llm-agents --skill elm-test-review
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: elm-test-review Source: https://github.com/bromanko/llm-agents/tree/main/skills/elm-test-review Command: npx skills add https://github.com/bromanko/llm-agents --skill elm-test-review
This Skill addresses the challenge of ensuring robust and comprehensive test suites for Elm applications, identifying gaps in coverage, and improving the overall quality and maintainability of tests.
Run /review elm test to start an interactive test review for your Elm project.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Elm test review identifies missing edge cases by mapping source files to tests and assessing coverage of custom type variants. It generates a structured Markdown report highlighting untested scenarios and skipped tests with severity indicators.
Analyzing Elm test coverage for working changes involves scoping the review to modified files, mapping source code to existing tests, and evaluating assertion patterns. The resulting report identifies untested public functions and critical code paths.
Checking Elm test quality requires evaluating tests against best practices for clarity, focus, and determinism. A review tool assesses assertion patterns and skipped tests, providing findings in a structured Markdown format with severity indicators.
Yes, you can scope the Elm test review based on user-specified files or working changes. This allows the analysis to target specific source-to-test mappings, coverage gaps, and edge case handling within the selected scope.
An Elm test coverage report includes findings on coverage gaps, missing edge cases, skipped tests, and assertion patterns. Results are presented in a structured Markdown format with severity indicators to highlight test quality issues.
Passing Elm tests may still miss critical code paths if untested public functions or unhandled custom type variants exist. A test review maps source to tests to pinpoint these coverage gaps and inadequate edge case handling.
carson-sweetAnalyze software project dependencies to identify downstream impacts of proposed changes.
nntan90Analyze test suites for anti-patterns, coverage gaps, and quality risks.
Kushal9889Sets up Husky git hooks to automate code quality checks and testing before commits.
asgarovfAnalyze pull requests for security vulnerabilities and SOLID principles.
