empirical-prompt-tuning

Evaluate and patch Hermes Agent prompts using blank-slate subagents.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/shichiyou/hermes-agent-001 --skill empirical-prompt-tuning-shichiyou
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: empirical-prompt-tuning
Source: https://github.com/shichiyou/hermes-agent-001/tree/main/.devcontainer/hermes-backup/skills/.archive/empirical-prompt-tuning
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/shichiyou/hermes-agent-001 --skill empirical-prompt-tuning-shichiyou

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a rigorous, repeatable workflow to empirically improve Hermes Agent prompts by using blank-slate subagents to execute target instructions, gather evidence, and drive iterative refinements to the skill sources.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Baseline evaluation: define 2-3 realistic scenarios, including edge cases, and record clear success criteria.
  • Blank-slate delegation: dispatch fresh subagents to implement and test instructions without prior context leakage.
  • Evidence-driven patching: collect artifacts and reports to inform precise SKILL.md updates via controlled patch cycles.
  • Knowledge preservation: link improvements to agent behavior, related skills, and operational runbooks (AGENTS.md, wiki procedures).

Quick Start

Run an evaluation round by dispatching fresh subagents to execute each scenario against the target skill and patch the SKILL.md based on findings.

Frequently Asked Questions about empirical-prompt-tuning

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I empirically evaluate and tune agent prompts to improve task performance?

Empirical prompt tuning improves agent prompts by dispatching blank-slate subagents to execute target instructions, gather evidence, and drive iterative refinements to the skill sources. This ensures changes are validated against realistic scenarios.

What is the best way to patch and verify agent instructions using fresh subagents?

Patching and verifying agent instructions requires dispatching fresh subagents to implement and test instructions without prior context leakage, collecting artifacts to inform precise SKILL.md updates via controlled patch cycles.

How do I set up baseline scenarios for evaluating agent-facing instructions?

Baseline evaluation requires defining 2-3 realistic scenarios including edge cases, recording clear success criteria, and executing these scenarios against the target skill using blank-slate delegation to measure current performance.

Why does empirical prompt tuning require structured frontmatter and a baseline workflow?

Structured frontmatter and a baseline workflow are required to define evaluation scenarios, success criteria, and subagent delegation protocols, ensuring repeatable evidence collection and controlled patching of SKILL.md updates.

Can I preserve knowledge links to related skills and operational runbooks when patching prompts?

Knowledge preservation links improvements to agent behavior, related skills, and operational runbooks like AGENTS.md and wiki procedures, ensuring patched prompts maintain operational context and integration across the system.

What are the limitations of using blank-slate subagents for prompt evaluation?

Blank-slate subagent evaluation requires structured frontmatter and baseline workflows to function, meaning without predefined realistic scenarios and success criteria, the evidence collection and prompt patching cycle cannot execute effectively.