What problem does it solve? Employment agreements, offer letters, severance agreements, and invention-assignment contracts contain clauses that are defective, unenforceable, or jurisdiction-sensitive, and spotting them requires a systematic review rather than ad-hoc reading. This Skill provides a structured checklist that tells you exactly where to look while leaving legal conclusions to retrieved governing law. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Six-area checklist: Covers restrictive covenants, IP and invention assignment, dispute resolution, compensation and forfeiture, term/termination/severance, and choice of law and forum. - Clause-level citations: Every finding cites the document and section as [<Document> § <section>], and missing terms are flagged as findings themselves. - Jurisdiction-sensitivity flags: Marks areas where employment law varies sharply by state or country and directs retrieval of current governing law via the legal-research skill before concluding. - Use Case: Reviewing a new hire's offer letter, you run the checklist and discover the non-compete is void under the governing state's statute, the invention-assignment clause lacks the required statutory notice, and the arbitration clause names a nonexistent arbitral body. ## Quick Start Review the attached employment agreement against the employment-review checklist and report findings with clause citations for each of the six areas.
