engineer-plan-reviewer

Validate engineering plan artifacts against stage manifests and motion-trajectory contracts.

2|Updated Jan 31, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/MRiabov/Problemologist-AI --skill engineer-plan-reviewer
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: engineer-plan-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/MRiabov/Problemologist-AI/tree/main/.agents/skills/engineer-plan-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/MRiabov/Problemologist-AI --skill engineer-plan-reviewer

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a structured review workflow for engineering plans and execution artifacts, ensuring plan fidelity, manufacturability, and safety constraints are satisfied.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Enforces manifest-compliant plan reviews and execution handoffs across the engineering lifecycle.
  • Validates simulation evidence, renders, and trajectory-grounding against formal motion contracts.
  • Use Case: teams verifying engineering_plan.md, todo.md, benchmark_definition.yaml, assembly_definition.yaml, or solution_script.py before manufacturing or deployment.

Quick Start

Run the Engineer Plan Reviewer on the latest engineering_plan.md to produce a stage-specific verdict.

Frequently Asked Questions about engineer-plan-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I validate an engineering plan against stage manifests and motion trajectory contracts?

To validate an engineering plan, you review engineering_plan.md, todo.md, and assembly_definition.yaml against explicit stage manifests, verifying plan fidelity, inventory grounding, and enforcing formal motion-trajectory proofs before approval.

What files are required to review engineering execution handoffs and simulation evidence?

Reviewing engineering execution handoffs requires benchmark_definition.yaml, assembly_definition.yaml, solution_plan_evidence_script.py, validation_results.json, and simulation_result.json to verify evidence integrity and trajectory grounding.

Does the engineering plan review process require media previews before approval?

Yes, the engineering plan review process requires formal motion and trajectory previews, along with required media inspection, to ensure manufacturability and safety constraints are satisfied before granting approval.

How do I check engineering plan fidelity and inventory grounding before manufacturing?

Checking engineering plan fidelity involves validating the engineering_plan.md and todo.md against assembly_definition.yaml to ensure inventory grounding and evidence integrity are satisfied before deployment or manufacturing.

What is the best way to enforce formal motion trajectory proofs in engineering plan reviews?

The best way to enforce formal motion trajectory proofs is by validating simulation_result.json and validation_results.json against explicit stage manifests, ensuring trajectory-grounding constraints are met before final approval.

Can I use this review workflow to validate solution plan evidence scripts?

Yes, this review workflow validates solution_plan_evidence_script.py to verify evidence integrity, ensuring the script's outputs align with benchmark_definition.yaml and motion trajectory contracts before manufacturing.