enhance-prompt

Convert vague legal prompts into structured prompts with role, jurisdiction, and output format.

46|25|Updated May 7, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/LegalQuants/lq-skills --skill enhance-prompt-legalquants
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: enhance-prompt
Source: https://github.com/LegalQuants/lq-skills/tree/main/skills/enhance-prompt
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/LegalQuants/lq-skills --skill enhance-prompt-legalquants

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Enhance Prompt helps when a user’s initial prompt is too short or ambiguous to reliably produce the intended legal work product by expanding it into a structured, explicit prompt before the model runs.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured legal prompt rewriting: Reframes the user’s request with role, jurisdiction, audience, scope, output format, constraints, and citation expectations where relevant.
  • Visible, editable expansion: Presents an “expand vs. skip” preview so the user can review changes before submitting.
  • Restraint via skip conditions: Avoids expanding well-structured prompts, follow-ups in an ongoing thread, conversational messages, purely operational requests, or prompts that opt out.
  • Multi-skill compatibility: Detects when other attached skills already handle expansion and avoids duplicating or conflicting instructions.

Quick Start

Invoke Enhance Prompt to rewrite your legal prompt with explicit role, jurisdiction, task scope, and a clear output format, then submit the expanded version you approve.

Frequently Asked Questions about enhance-prompt

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I structure a vague legal prompt for better AI outputs?▼

Legal prompt rewriting converts short or ambiguous requests into structured prompts by defining explicit role, jurisdiction, scope, constraints, and output format. This mechanism ensures the AI model reliably produces the intended legal work product from one-shot drafting or review tasks.

When should I use a meta prompt for legal workflows?▼

Use a meta prompt for legal workflows when your initial request is too short or ambiguous for reliable drafting or review. It applies to one-shot legal requests, reframing the ask with explicit jurisdiction and constraints while respecting attached skill scopes to ensure structured output.

How do I rewrite a short legal request into a structured prompt?▼

You rewrite a legal request by expanding it with explicit role, jurisdiction, task scope, audience, output format, and citation expectations. The tool produces an expand versus skip preview, allowing you to review the structured reasoning and approve the expanded prompt before sending.

Does prompt rewriting work with ongoing conversational threads?▼

Prompt rewriting does not apply to ongoing conversational follow-ups, well-structured prompts, or purely operational requests. The tool applies skip conditions to avoid expanding conversational messages and detects when attached skills already handle expansion to prevent conflicting instructions.

Are there limitations to using automated prompt expansion for legal drafting?▼

Limitations of automated prompt expansion include skipping well-structured prompts, conversational messages, and purely operational requests. It also avoids duplicating instructions if other attached skills already handle expansion, meaning it only actively intervenes for ambiguous one-shot legal drafting tasks.