epic-blitz

To validate an epic document, you run a non-interactive execution over a provided draft input path. The process applies a three-round adversarial critique to verify milestone decomposition, strategic alignment, and implementation feasibility, ultimately producing a revised, chain-ready epic.

Preparing a draft epic for chain planning requires subjecting it to a parallel panel review of fifteen critics across multiple abstraction levels. This process generates artifact-oriented findings and a terminal readiness assessment to determine if the epic is ready for chain decomposition into milestone briefs.

An adversarial critique pipeline improves epic artifact modeling by forcing structured revisions after each review round. Fifteen critics analyze orchestration semantics and CLI usability, generating focused findings that guide a senior reviser to update the epic and ensure robust artifact generation.

Automated pipeline revision supports non-interactive execution over a provided draft input path, meaning no manual intervention is required during the critique process. The system autonomously executes the three critique rounds and revisions to output structured panel artifacts.

A terminal readiness assessment artifact is needed when you must determine whether your revised epic is fully prepared for megaplan chain decomposition. It validates that all abstraction levels have been critiqued and updated, confirming the epic is ready to be broken down into milestone briefs.