epistemic-check

Name: epistemic-check
Availability: InStock
Author: enduser123

Validate Q&A responses against the 4-section epistemic contract with a three-phase audit.

Updated May 14, 2026

Search Tags:#validation #audit #compliance #safety #reasoning #contract #epistemic

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/EndUser123/cc-skills-analysis --skill epistemic-check

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: epistemic-check
Source: https://github.com/EndUser123/cc-skills-analysis/tree/main/skills/epistemic-check
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/EndUser123/cc-skills-analysis --skill epistemic-check

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Validate epistemic integrity of Q&A responses against a formal contract, auditing structure and content to surface violations and repairs.

Core Features & Use Cases

Applies a three-phase audit (format → causal → comparative) to any answer.
Reports phase-level issues and minimal repairs for violations.
Suitable for QA reviews, safety checks, and knowledge validation workflows.

Quick Start

Provide a sample question and answer pair to analyze against the epistemic contract.

Frequently Asked Questions about epistemic-check

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I audit AI answers for reasoning traceability and safety?▼

To audit AI answers for reasoning traceability, you validate responses against a formal contract using a three-phase audit checking format, causal logic, and comparative accuracy to surface violations and minimal repairs.

What is epistemic integrity validation for question answering systems?▼

Epistemic integrity validation is the process of auditing Q&A responses against a formal contract to ensure reasoning traceability and safety, checking structure and content to report phase-level issues and necessary repairs.

How do I check if a knowledge base response violates compliance contracts?▼

Check compliance contract violations by running the response through a three-phase audit evaluating format, causal reasoning, and comparative data to identify specific issues and generate minimal repairs.

Can I use automated validation for interactive QA and assistant prompts?▼

Yes, you can use automated validation for interactive QA and assistant prompts by providing a sample question and answer pair to analyze against the epistemic contract, outputting a verdict and repairs for governance.

What is the best way to identify minimal repairs for unsafe reasoning outputs?▼

The best way to identify minimal repairs for unsafe reasoning outputs is applying a comparative audit phase that evaluates the response against the epistemic contract, reporting targeted fixes for any detected violations.

When should I not use a three-phase format causal comparative audit?▼

You should avoid a three-phase format causal comparative audit when evaluating open-ended creative text lacking factual queries, as the epistemic contract requires traceable reasoning and structured safety compliance validation.