error-analysis

Convert AI failure traces into structured categories with root-cause diagnoses.

70|34|Updated Apr 7, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Productfculty-aipm/PM-Copilot-by-Product-Faculty --skill error-analysis-productfculty-aipm
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: error-analysis
Source: https://github.com/Productfculty-aipm/PM-Copilot-by-Product-Faculty/tree/main/skills/error-analysis
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Productfculty-aipm/PM-Copilot-by-Product-Faculty --skill error-analysis-productfculty-aipm

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps product teams and evaluators systematically analyze AI output failures by converting raw failure traces and user feedback into actionable, prioritized failure modes that drive meaningful evaluation and remediation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured Open Coding: Guided process to produce free-form failure descriptions from input→output traces and user feedback.
  • Axial Coding & Prioritization: Group failures into a concise set of named categories with definitions, examples, and frequency counts.
  • Root Cause Analysis & Eval Design: Diagnose causes for the top three failure categories and recommend specific evaluation methods and remediation steps.
  • Use Case: Apply to 30–100 model failure examples to surface the highest-impact error modes and design targeted automated evals or prompt/model fixes.

Quick Start

Provide a dataset of 30–100 AI input-output failure pairs and ask the assistant to open-code each failure, group them into categories with counts and percentages, diagnose root causes for the top three categories, and recommend evaluation designs.

Frequently Asked Questions about error-analysis

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I analyze AI model failures and categorize user feedback?

To analyze AI model failures, apply open coding to raw input-output traces and user feedback to generate free-form descriptions, then group them into named categories with frequency counts and percentages. This converts raw failure data into structured, prioritized error categories.

What is the best way to find root causes of AI failure modes?

The best way to find root causes of AI failure modes is to perform axial coding on grouped failure categories, diagnose the top three categories, and generate recommended fixes. This targets the highest-impact error modes for meaningful remediation.

How many AI input-output failure examples do I need for open coding analysis?

You need a dataset of 30 to 100 AI input-output failure examples for open coding analysis. Applying structured coding to this volume of failure traces and complaint tickets surfaces the highest-impact error modes and drives targeted evaluation design.

How do I design automated evals for known bad AI output examples?

To design automated evals for known bad AI output examples, diagnose root causes for your top failure categories and generate specific evaluation method recommendations. This translates structured failure categories into targeted automated evals or prompt fixes.

Can I use axial coding to group complaint tickets into error categories?

Yes, you can use axial coding to group complaint tickets into error categories. The process converts raw failure traces and user feedback into a concise set of named categories complete with definitions, examples, and frequency counts.

What is the difference between open coding and axial coding for model traces?

For model traces, open coding produces free-form failure descriptions from individual input-output pairs, whereas axial coding groups those failures into named categories with definitions, examples, and frequency counts to prioritize remediation.