eu-ai-act-specialist

Classify AI systems under EU AI Act risk tiers and generate conformity assessment plans.

25.3k|3.6k|Updated Oct 19, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill eu-ai-act-specialist
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: eu-ai-act-specialist
Source: https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/tree/main/ra-qm-team/compliance-team-eu-ai-act/skills/eu-ai-act-specialist
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill eu-ai-act-specialist

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Compliance teams struggle to determine how Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 applies to their AI systems: which risk tier each system falls into, which conformity assessment route high-risk systems require, and which obligations apply per organizational role with their phased deadlines.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Risk-Tier Classification: Deterministically classify AI systems as prohibited (Article 5), high-risk (Article 6 + Annex III), limited-risk (Article 50), or minimal-risk, including Article 6(3) carve-out logic and GPAI systemic-risk thresholds.
  • Conformity Assessment Planning: Select the Article 43 route (Module A internal control vs Module H notified body) and produce the full Annex IV technical documentation checklist with reuse mapping from ISO 42001/27001 evidence.
  • Per-Role Obligation Tracking: Generate a deadline-sorted obligation matrix for providers, deployers, importers, distributors, and authorized representatives aligned to the Article 113 phasing dates (2025–2027).
  • Use Case: During AI system intake review, run the classifier on a CV-screening tool to confirm it is Annex III employment high-risk, then generate the conformity plan and obligation list before EU market placement.

Quick Start

Ask the AI to classify your AI system under the EU AI Act and list the obligations and deadlines for your organizational role.

Frequently Asked Questions about eu-ai-act-specialist

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I classify an AI system under the EU AI Act?

Run ai_system_risk_classifier.py with a JSON file describing the system's purpose, Annex III category, profiling behavior, and Article 5 practices. The script applies the decision order: Article 5 prohibitions, Article 6(1) safety components, Annex III categories, Article 6(3) carve-outs, Article 50 transparency, then minimal-risk default.

What is the difference between Module A and Module H conformity assessment?

Module A is internal control self-assessment permitted for most Annex III systems applying harmonised standards. Module H requires a full quality management system plus notified body involvement and is mandatory for biometrics under Article 43(1).

Does the EU AI Act apply to non-EU companies?

Yes, the Act is extraterritorial and applies to non-EU providers placing AI systems on the EU market. Non-EU providers must appoint an authorized representative established in the EU per Article 22, which the obligation tracker flags automatically.

When do EU AI Act obligations take effect?

Article 5 prohibitions and AI literacy apply from 2 February 2025, GPAI obligations from 2 August 2025, general high-risk Title III obligations from 2 August 2026, and Annex I sectoral obligations from 2 August 2027, per Article 113 phasing.

Can ISO 42001 certification be reused for EU AI Act compliance?

Yes, ISO 42001 evidence substantially satisfies Article 17 QMS requirements and maps to Annex IV documentation items including risk management, lifecycle evidence, and monitoring. The conformity planner outputs specific reuse notes when existing ISO 42001 or ISO 27001 certifications are declared.

What are the limitations of automated AI Act classification?

The classifier trusts the caller's pre-determination of Article 5 practices and does not provide binding legal opinions. Novel cases such as GPAI boundary questions or substantial modification determinations require qualified legal counsel.