What problem does it solve?
Compliance teams struggle to determine how Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 applies to their AI systems: which risk tier each system falls into, which conformity assessment route high-risk systems require, and which obligations apply per organizational role with their phased deadlines.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Risk-Tier Classification: Deterministically classify AI systems as prohibited (Article 5), high-risk (Article 6 + Annex III), limited-risk (Article 50), or minimal-risk, including Article 6(3) carve-out logic and GPAI systemic-risk thresholds.
- Conformity Assessment Planning: Select the Article 43 route (Module A internal control vs Module H notified body) and produce the full Annex IV technical documentation checklist with reuse mapping from ISO 42001/27001 evidence.
- Per-Role Obligation Tracking: Generate a deadline-sorted obligation matrix for providers, deployers, importers, distributors, and authorized representatives aligned to the Article 113 phasing dates (2025–2027).
- Use Case: During AI system intake review, run the classifier on a CV-screening tool to confirm it is Annex III employment high-risk, then generate the conformity plan and obligation list before EU market placement.
Quick Start
Ask the AI to classify your AI system under the EU AI Act and list the obligations and deadlines for your organizational role.