european-patent-claims-review

Analyze European patent claims for EPC prosecution issues and amendment risk.

33|7|Updated Mar 19, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/patsnap/skills --skill european-patent-claims-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: european-patent-claims-review
Source: https://github.com/patsnap/skills/tree/main/open-platform/european-patent-claims-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/patsnap/skills --skill european-patent-claims-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It helps patent teams quickly assess whether European patent claims are ready for EPO prosecution and where they are vulnerable to objections.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Reviews claim sets for clarity, support, added matter, sufficiency, unity, and novelty/inventive-step positioning.
  • Suggests concrete amendment language and fallback claim strategies for European prosecution.
  • Use case: a Chinese draft or PCT/EP national phase application needs an EPC-style audit before filing or response drafting.

Quick Start

Upload the claims or application text and ask for a European patent claim review with EPC-focused risks and amendment suggestions.

Frequently Asked Questions about european-patent-claims-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review European patent claims for EPO prosecution issues?

European patent claim review analyzes applications for clarity, support, sufficiency, unity, and inventive-step risks. It identifies claim defects, maps dependency architecture, and recommends concrete EPC-style revisions for safer prosecution.

Can I audit a Chinese patent draft intended for Europe under EPC rules?

Yes, EPC-focused claim review supports Chinese drafts intended for Europe. It evaluates the text for added matter, sufficiency, and unity, then suggests actionable amendment language and fallback strategies for European filing.

What is the best way to identify added matter risks in a PCT/EP national phase application?

The best way to identify added matter risks is by reviewing the PCT/EP national phase text against EPC standards. This process flags unsupported amendments and provides concrete EPC-style revisions to mitigate prosecution objections.

Does this claim review suggest concrete amendment language for EPO office actions?

Yes, the claim review suggests concrete amendment language and fallback claim strategies. It maps the dependency architecture and provides EPC-style revisions to directly address clarity, support, and inventive-step objections.

When do I need a European patent claim review with actionable amendments?

You need a European patent claim review when preparing an application, PCT/EP national phase text, or uploaded claim set for filing or response drafting. It audits for EPO/EPC prosecution vulnerabilities like unity and sufficiency.