What problem does it solve? Creators often have topics that are not yet formed into clear angles, or judgments and drafts that carry hidden blind spots. This Skill opens unformed topics through the most explanatory academic disciplines and pressure-tests formed judgments from reader, opponent, industry-reality, and creator perspectives. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Disciplinary Divergence: Opens a raw topic through the most relevant disciplines (sociology, psychology, economics, etc.) and returns up to 3 directions plus one recommended starting point. - Quick Four-Perspective Scan: Reviews a formed idea, title, script, or business judgment from four perspectives and delivers the biggest blind spot plus one change to make. - Deep Review: Runs a structured argument stress test with evidence mapping, strongest counterexample, counterfactual analysis, and falsification conditions. - Use Case: You have a short-video thesis like "people fail at learning AI because they start too big." Run a deep review to surface the weakest premise, the strongest counterexample, and what fact would overturn the conclusion before publishing. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to use Eva Lens on your topic or judgment, for example: use eva-lens to stress-test my conclusion that short videos outperform long articles for building trust.