eval-before-optimize

Validate whether evaluation improvements are statistically meaningful before optimizing post-training models.

1|Updated Apr 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/KangOxford/auto-quant-research --skill eval-before-optimize
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: eval-before-optimize
Source: https://github.com/KangOxford/auto-quant-research/tree/main/execution-layer/skills/eval-before-optimize
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/KangOxford/auto-quant-research --skill eval-before-optimize

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Verifying eval precision before claiming improvements from RL/ES post-training to prevent mistaking noise for learning.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Validate eval noise floor by repeating evaluations across seeds and runs to establish a robust baseline.
  • Compute required sample size and baseline variance to determine when results are statistically meaningful.
  • Apply guardrails before proceeding with post-training optimizations to avoid pursuing spurious gains.

Quick Start

Run a baseline eval to measure noise and then decide whether the observed improvement is confident enough to pursue post-training optimization.

Frequently Asked Questions about eval-before-optimize

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I check if my post-training eval results are statistically significant?

To verify post-training eval results are statistically significant, repeat evaluations across seeds to establish baseline variance and compute required sample size to confirm results exceed the noise floor.

How do I measure eval noise floor for RL experiments?

Measure eval noise floor for RL experiments by repeating evaluations across multiple seeds and runs, establishing a robust baseline variance to distinguish actual learning from noise.

Why does my evaluation variance change between post-training runs?

Evaluation variance fluctuates between post-training runs due to seed differences and sampling randomness, requiring repeated evals to establish a baseline before claiming improvements.

What is the best way to prevent mistaking noise for signal in ES optimization?

The best way to prevent mistaking noise for signal in ES optimization is applying threshold-based guardrails after repeated evals to validate statistical significance before proceeding.

How do I know when to continue optimization after post-training?

Know when to continue optimization after post-training by running a baseline variance check and applying threshold-based decisions to confirm observed improvements are confident enough to pursue.

Can I use repeated evals for small-scale post-training experiments?

Repeated evals work for small-scale post-training experiments across varying models and evaluation setups, computing required sample size to determine when results become statistically meaningful.