eval-harness

Codify pass/fail criteria and baseline performance for Claude Code sessions.

Updated Feb 19, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/danielkhigay/gaz --skill eval-harness-danielkhigay
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: eval-harness
Source: https://github.com/danielkhigay/gaz/tree/main/.claude/skills/archived/eval-harness
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/danielkhigay/gaz --skill eval-harness-danielkhigay

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Formal evaluation framework for Claude Code sessions implementing eval-driven development (EDD) principles helps teams define, run, and track structured assessments of AI outputs, enabling early detection of regressions and clearer success criteria.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Capability and Regression Evals structure evaluation criteria
  • Supports three grader types: Code-Based, Model-Based, and Human, for flexible validation
  • Tracks pass@k and pass^k metrics across model versions and prompts
  • Provides reproducible baseline testing and artifact storage for regression checks

Quick Start

Define eval criteria, implement tests, and run the eval suite to produce a results report.

Frequently Asked Questions about eval-harness

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I set up regression testing for AI coding sessions?

Regression testing for AI coding sessions is set up by codifying pass/fail criteria and baselining performance. You define deterministic graders to run repeatable checks across different prompts and model versions.

What is eval-driven development and how does it evaluate Claude Code outputs?

Eval-driven development evaluates Claude Code outputs by defining, running, and tracking structured assessments. It captures pass@k and pass^k metrics to establish clear success criteria and detect regressions early.

Can I use different types of graders for AI task evaluation?

AI task evaluation supports three distinct grader types: code-based, model-based, and human. This flexible validation approach allows teams to apply deterministic checks tailored to specific output requirements.

How do I track AI quality assurance metrics across different model versions?

Quality assurance metrics are tracked by storing standardized eval artifacts in .claude/evals. This enables reproducible baseline testing and consistent regression checks across varying model versions and prompts.

Does this evaluation framework require any external dependencies?

This evaluation framework operates without external dependencies. It relies entirely on implementing structured eval criteria and deterministic graders to produce reproducible baseline testing results.

What is the best way to codify pass/fail criteria for AI generated code?

The best way to codify pass/fail criteria is implementing structured capability and regression evals. This formal approach applies deterministic graders to validate AI outputs and generate standardized eval artifacts.