eval-harness

Define and execute eval-driven tests for Claude Code sessions.

1|1|Updated Mar 31, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/zardusai-cyber/zardus_setup --skill eval-harness-zardusai-cyber
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: eval-harness
Source: https://github.com/zardusai-cyber/zardus_setup/tree/main/ecc/skills/eval-harness
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/zardusai-cyber/zardus_setup --skill eval-harness-zardusai-cyber

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Formal evaluation framework for Claude Code sessions enabling structured testing, reliable benchmarks, and reproducible results.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Capabilities evaluation and regression tests
  • Multiple graders (code-based, model-based, human)
  • Clear metrics and baselines for model versions

Quick Start

Run the eval harness to define and execute eval-driven tests for Claude Code tasks.

Frequently Asked Questions about eval-harness

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I set up regression tests for Claude Code workflows?

Regression tests for Claude Code workflows are set up using a formal evaluation framework that defines capability evaluations, graders, and metrics across model versions. It supports code-based, model-based, and human graders with structured storage.

What is eval-driven development for AI coding sessions?

Eval-driven development for AI coding sessions is a structured testing approach using a formal harness to define benchmarks, apply graders, and measure pass-at-k metrics. It ensures reproducible results and reliable capability tracking across model versions.

Can I use model-based grading to evaluate Claude Code capabilities?

Model-based grading is fully supported for evaluating Claude Code capabilities alongside code-based and human graders. The framework allows you to combine multiple grader types to measure metrics and establish baselines for different model versions.

How do I measure pass-at-k metrics for code generation models?

Pass-at-k metrics for code generation models are measured by running the evaluation harness to execute defined capability tests and apply graders. The framework stores results to establish clear baselines and track regression across model versions.

What's the best way to structure evaluation data for AI model grading?

Evaluation data for AI model grading should follow the framework's documented storage and guideline layout. This structured approach ensures reproducible benchmarks and reliable metrics when applying code-based, model-based, or human graders.

Are there limitations to using automated graders for regression evaluation?

Automated graders for regression evaluation work well for code-based and model-based metrics, but human graders are also supported for subjective or complex capability assessments. Combining grader types provides the most reliable results across model versions.