eval-pe-output

Evaluate AI-generated PE documents for citation accuracy and hallucination rate.

Updated Apr 25, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/bolnet/private-equity --skill eval-pe-output
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: eval-pe-output
Source: https://github.com/bolnet/private-equity/tree/main/finance-mcp-plugin/skills/private-equity/eval-pe-output
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/bolnet/private-equity --skill eval-pe-output

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a deterministic and reproducible evaluation of AI-generated PE documents, ensuring accuracy and consistency without relying on LLMs.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Citation Accuracy: Ensures every financial figure in the document traces back to a source field.
  • Hallucination Rate: Checks for the presence of named entities in the source.
  • Coverage: Measures the fraction of source opportunities addressed in the memo.
  • Consistency: Verifies that memos derived from the same source agree on the headline number.
  • Use Case: Use this Skill to grade a PE document AI output against its structured source-of-truth, closing the trust gap for PE shops.

Quick Start

Run the eval_pe_output skill with the memo JSON path and source JSON path.

Frequently Asked Questions about eval-pe-output

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I check AI-generated PE documents for hallucinations and citation accuracy?

To check AI-generated PE documents for hallucinations and citation accuracy, you can evaluate the memo against a structured source-of-truth. This verifies that financial figures trace back to source fields and confirms named entities actually exist in the source data.

What is source-of-truth validation for private equity document evaluation?

Source-of-truth validation for private equity document evaluation is a deterministic process that measures AI output accuracy without LLM calls. It checks citation accuracy, hallucination rate, coverage, and consistency against structured JSON data to ensure reproducibility and defensibility.

How do I evaluate PE memo consistency using JSON sidecars and OpportunityMap files?

To evaluate PE memo consistency using JSON sidecars and OpportunityMap files, provide the memo JSON path and source JSON path to the evaluation script. It verifies that memos derived from the same source agree on the headline number and measures source coverage.

Do I need an LLM to grade AI output for citation accuracy and consistency?

You do not need an LLM to grade AI output for citation accuracy and consistency. This evaluation process uses deterministic scripts to compare documents against structured JSON sources, ensuring reproducible and defensible results without relying on language models.

Can I use deterministic scripts to measure coverage in private equity memos?

You can use deterministic scripts to measure coverage in private equity memos. The evaluation checks the fraction of source opportunities addressed in the document by comparing the memo JSON directly against the OpportunityMap JSON from the diagnostic tool.

What are the limitations of using deterministic evaluation for AI-generated financial documents?

A limitation of using deterministic evaluation for AI-generated financial documents is the strict dependency on specific JSON sidecars and OpportunityMap files from the diagnostic tool. It cannot evaluate unstructured text or sources lacking this structured metadata.