eval-runner

Automate AI feature evaluation for PII leakage and hallucination detection in CI pipelines.

Updated May 30, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/InnerScopeHearing/otchealth-claude-tools --skill eval-runner-innerscopehearing
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agentโ–ผ
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: eval-runner
Source: https://github.com/InnerScopeHearing/otchealth-claude-tools/tree/main/skills/eval-runner
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/InnerScopeHearing/otchealth-claude-tools --skill eval-runner-innerscopehearing

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

๐Ÿ’ก This Skill requires promptfoo, and includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

The eval-runner Skill solves the problem of reliably assessing the quality and safety of AI features within applications. It automates the process of testing AI-powered features, such as symptom chatbots or medical Q&A systems, for accuracy, factuality, and safety.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated AI Evaluation: Runs deterministic tests for AI features to assess their quality and safety.
  • Red-Teaming: Identifies potential security risks like PII leakage and jailbreak attempts.
  • CI Integration: Integrates as a quality gate in the Continuous Integration (CI) pipeline to prevent regressions.

Quick Start

Run the eval-runner skill to evaluate the quality and safety of a new AI feature in your application.

Frequently Asked Questions about eval-runner

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate AI evaluation for safety and hallucination detection in a CI pipeline?โ–ผ

Automated AI evaluation in a CI pipeline uses deterministic tests to assess quality, detect hallucinations, and identify PII leakage. Integrating this as a quality gate prevents regressions by ensuring AI-generated content remains accurate and safe before deployment.

What is red-teaming for AI safety and how does it prevent PII leakage?โ–ผ

Red-teaming for AI safety identifies potential security risks like PII leakage and jailbreak attempts. It systematically probes AI features to expose vulnerabilities, ensuring models do not expose sensitive data or bypass safety guardrails.

How do I test AI chatbots for medical Q&A accuracy and factuality?โ–ผ

Testing AI chatbots for medical Q&A accuracy involves running automated evaluations to verify factuality and grounding. This ensures health application responses are accurate and safe, preventing harmful misinformation from reaching users.

Do I need promptfoo to run automated AI evaluations and red-teaming?โ–ผ

Yes, promptfoo is required to run these automated AI evaluations and red-teaming. It provides the underlying testing framework to execute deterministic tests and identify security risks within your AI features.

Can I use automated AI evaluation as a quality gate for health applications?โ–ผ

Yes, automated AI evaluation integrates directly into CI pipelines as a quality gate for health applications. It ensures AI-generated content for features like symptom chatbots is accurate, grounded, and safe before any code merges.

What are the limitations of using promptfoo for CI integration in AI safety?โ–ผ

Using promptfoo for CI integration focuses on deterministic testing and red-teaming, meaning it evaluates predefined scenarios and security probes. It requires configured test cases and may not catch novel safety issues outside its defined evaluation parameters.