eval-triage-and-improvement

Triage Copilot Studio eval results into structured reports with owners and actions.

123|20|Updated Mar 30, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/microsoft/eval-guide --skill eval-triage-and-improvement
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: eval-triage-and-improvement
Source: https://github.com/microsoft/eval-guide/tree/main/skills/eval-triage-and-improvement
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/microsoft/eval-guide --skill eval-triage-and-improvement

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps operators interpret evaluation results, identify root causes of failing tests, prioritize remediation steps, and guide iterative improvements across eval cycles.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Interactive triage: walk through results, classify failures, and assign owners.
  • Prioritized remediation: map failures to concrete fixes and re-run cycles.
  • Lifecycle coverage: supports Stage 2-4 workflows and operationalization of eval improvements.

Quick Start

Upload your eval results CSV and run this skill to generate a structured triage plan.

Frequently Asked Questions about eval-triage-and-improvement

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I triage Copilot Studio eval results to find root causes of failing tests?

To triage Copilot Studio eval results, upload your eval results CSV to apply a triage framework that classifies failures, identifies root causes, and maps them to actionable remediation paths with assigned owners.

What is the best way to interpret evaluation results for iterative Copilot improvements?

Interpreting evaluation results for iterative improvements involves classifying test failures, prioritizing remediation steps, and generating a structured triage report that aligns with the evaluation playbook across Stage 2-4 workflows.

How do I map eval failures to concrete remediation steps for Copilot Studio?

Mapping eval failures to remediation steps requires applying a triage framework to your results, which translates identified root causes into actionable fixes and documents the operational rationale and limitations.

Does the eval triage framework support Stage 2-4 evaluation cycles?

Yes, the eval triage framework supports Stage 2-4 evaluation cycles, allowing you to operationalize iterative improvements by walking through results, assigning owners, and guiding re-run cycles.

Why should I use a structured triage report instead of manually reviewing eval failures?

Using a structured triage report ensures failures map to concrete remediation paths, align with the evaluation playbook, and document rationale and limitations, whereas manual review lacks systematic owner assignment and verification.