eval-writer

Automates creation and validation of AI evaluation suites using trace-driven error analysis and binary judges.

Updated Jun 5, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/cody-hutson/pmo-platform --skill eval-writer-cody-hutson
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: eval-writer
Source: https://github.com/cody-hutson/pmo-platform/tree/main/core/skills/eval-writer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/cody-hutson/pmo-platform --skill eval-writer-cody-hutson

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires pmo-skill-refiner, CI, production observability, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the process of creating and validating evaluation suites for AI systems, ensuring that they meet rigorous quality standards.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Evaluation Suite Creation: Authors comprehensive evaluation suites for AI agents, skills, and LLM systems.
  • Trace-Driven Analysis: Utilizes real outputs for trace-driven error analysis.
  • Binary Judges: Implements binary pass/fail outputs for clarity and precision.
  • Cross-Family Validation: Validates judges against human labels for reliability.
  • Use Case: Use this Skill to create an evaluation suite for a new AI model, ensuring it meets the necessary quality criteria before deployment.

Quick Start

Use the eval-writer skill to create an evaluation suite for the "daily-status" skill.

Frequently Asked Questions about eval-writer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I create an evaluation suite for AI agents and LLM systems?

Trace-driven error analysis uses real production outputs to identify specific failure modes in AI systems. By examining actual execution traces, you can author targeted evaluation suite cases that directly validate agent behavior against observed errors rather than synthetic scenarios.

How do I validate AI evaluation judges against human labels?

Cross-family validation checks binary judges against human labels to ensure evaluation reliability. By comparing automated pass/fail outputs with human-labeled data, you verify that your AI evaluation suite consistently reflects human judgment for quality assurance.

Do I need production observability and CI to automate AI evaluation?

Yes, automating AI evaluation requires production observability and CI pipelines to supply real trace data and execute validation continuously. These dependencies provide the actual outputs and integration infrastructure needed for rigorous trace-driven analysis and suite validation.

What is the best way to automate quality assurance for AI development?

The best way to automate AI quality assurance is by generating evaluation suites with binary judges and trace-driven analysis. This approach provides clear pass/fail validation criteria and cross-family checks to rigorously test LLM systems before and after deployment.

Why use binary judges for AI evaluation instead of scalar scoring?

Binary judges provide clear pass/fail outputs for precision in AI evaluation, avoiding the ambiguity of scalar scoring. This strict validation method ensures your evaluation suite delivers unambiguous quality criteria for AI agents and LLM systems.