evaluate-content

Evaluate content quality with a six-question framework and numeric or classification outputs.

37|12|Updated Feb 24, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/exiao/skills --skill evaluate-content
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: evaluate-content
Source: https://github.com/exiao/skills/tree/main/evaluate-content
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/exiao/skills --skill evaluate-content

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a rigorous framework for evaluating content quality across multiple dimensions, ensuring that all published material meets high standards for engagement, clarity, and impact.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Comprehensive Evaluation: Assesses content against six critical questions: shareability, informativeness/readability, human voice, leanness, unique perspective, and target audience fit.
  • Scoring and Feedback: Provides both numeric scores (1-30) for standalone use and classification labels (STRONG/NEEDS WORK/WEAK) for integration with other skills.
  • Use Case: Before publishing an article, run it through this Skill to get a detailed critique, identify areas for improvement, and ensure it resonates with the intended audience and brand voice.

Quick Start

Use the evaluate-content skill to judge the quality of the attached article draft.

Frequently Asked Questions about evaluate-content

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate content quality before publishing an article?

To evaluate content quality before publishing, assess the draft against a six-question framework covering shareability, substance, voice, leanness, perspective, and audience fit to identify areas for improvement.

What is the best way to critique an article's readability and brand voice?

The best way to critique readability and brand voice is to analyze the text for human voice, leanness, and unique perspective, generating a detailed critique with numeric scores to ensure it resonates with the intended audience.

Can I get a numeric score for content shareability and substance?

Yes, you can get a numeric score for content shareability and substance. The evaluation framework provides a 1-30 numeric score for standalone use alongside classification labels like STRONG or WEAK for workflow integration.

How do I assess Twitter threads and headlines against editorial review criteria?

You assess Twitter threads and headlines against editorial review criteria by applying the same six-question evaluation framework and hard filters, checking for informativeness, unique angle, and target audience fit.

Does content evaluation support classification outputs for automated workflows?

Content evaluation supports automated workflows by providing classification outputs such as STRONG, NEEDS WORK, and WEAK labels, which can be directly integrated with other content processing skills.

What are the limitations of using a six-question framework for writing critique?

A limitation of using a six-question writing critique framework is that it strictly bounds analysis to shareability, substance, voice, leanness, perspective, and reader fit, applying hard filters that may reject edge-case content outside these criteria.