evaluate-factor

Routes factor evaluation tasks to cross-sectional or time-series workflows.

116|38|Updated Feb 26, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/xingwudao/open-xquant --skill evaluate-factor
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: evaluate-factor
Source: https://github.com/xingwudao/open-xquant/tree/main/agent/skills/evaluate-factor
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/xingwudao/open-xquant --skill evaluate-factor

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill eliminates the risk of selecting the wrong factor evaluation workflow for quantitative research, which leads to invalid or misleading conclusions about whether a factor predicts asset returns.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Workflow Routing: Automatically selects the appropriate cross-sectional or time-series factor evaluation workflow based on the number of symbols and research goal (e.g., stock selection vs. directional timing).
  • Guardrails Enforcement: Enforces critical data requirements like forward-return alignment, multi-horizon testing, and transparency around sample size and turnover to avoid biased results.
  • Use Case: For example, if a user wants to test if a value factor predicts 6-month returns for 80 mid-cap stocks, this Skill routes the task to the cross-sectional workflow to calculate IC, Rank IC, and ICIR metrics correctly.

Quick Start

Use the evaluate-factor skill to test whether the 3-month momentum factor predicts 1-month forward returns for the top 50 US large-cap stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions about evaluate-factor

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate if a quantitative factor predicts asset returns correctly?

To evaluate factor performance correctly, route the quantitative factor evaluation task to the appropriate cross-sectional or time-series workflow based on your symbol universe size and research goal.

What is the difference between cross-sectional and time-series factor evaluation?

Cross-sectional factor evaluation calculates metrics like IC and ICIR for large symbol universes to test stock selection, whereas time-series evaluation measures directional timing metrics like hit rate and decay curves for small rotation sets.

How do I calculate IC and ICIR for a large universe of stocks?

To calculate IC and ICIR for a large universe of stocks, use the cross-sectional factor evaluation workflow, which enforces forward-return alignment and discloses sample size and turnover to ensure valid performance analysis.

Can I test multiple return horizons when evaluating factor performance?

Yes, you can test multiple return horizons when evaluating factor performance, as the factor evaluation workflow enforces multi-horizon testing alongside forward-return alignment to prevent biased or misleading conclusions.

Does factor evaluation work for small rotation sets and directional timing?

Factor evaluation works for small rotation sets by routing the task to the time-series workflow, which calculates directional timing metrics such as hit rate and decay curves instead of cross-sectional IC.

Why does my factor performance analysis produce biased results?

Factor performance analysis produces biased results if it lacks forward-return alignment, multi-horizon testing, or transparency around sample size and turnover, which the evaluation workflow enforces to prevent invalid conclusions.