evaluate-issue-pr

What problem does it solve?

It independently checks whether a submitted pull request correctly implements an already-approved implementation plan, and produces a clear approval or flagged verdict to protect merges.

Core Features & Use Cases

• Trust-gated plan retrieval: Only a trusted-authored “Implementation Plan” comment is used as the source of truth for what the PR must implement.
• Plan compliance verification: Confirms each plan item’s “Files to change” and required categories (DB schema/API/frontend/tests), and flags missing or incorrect work while avoiding unnecessary refactors.
• Quality and safety review: Runs typechecking and tests, then inspects the diff for issues like leftover debug code, missing error handling, injection/XSS risks, and insufficient test coverage.
• CI-aware decisioning: Detects failed/cancelled CI checks and prevents approval when the PR is red, retrying with a fix when allowed by budget.
• Optional visual proof adjudication: For PRs/issue flows that require browser evidence, it invokes the relevant visual-proof skill and flags unsatisfied claims for human review.
• Auto-merge gate enforcement: When conditions are satisfied (and not opted out), it performs a controlled merge with safeguards like base-branch TOCTOU re-checks and screenshot URL rewriting for durability.

Quick Start

Use /pipeline:evaluate-issue-pr <issue_number> inside the feature worktree to review the PR against its trusted implementation plan and post an evaluation verdict.