evaluate-physics-problem

Evaluate physics problems for correctness, design value, and teaching suitability.

Updated Jun 18, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/zzr2718281828/claude-physics --skill evaluate-physics-problem
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: evaluate-physics-problem
Source: https://github.com/zzr2718281828/claude-physics/tree/main/.claude/skills/evaluate-physics-problem
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/zzr2718281828/claude-physics --skill evaluate-physics-problem

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps educators and reviewers determine whether a physics problem is worth using by providing a structured assessment of correctness, reasoning value, clarity, difficulty, and teaching suitability.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Quantitative Evaluation: Scores physics problems on a 100-point scale across seven dimensions with detailed deduction reasons.
  • Quality Diagnosis: Checks physical consistency, hidden assumptions, ambiguity risks, computational burden, and educational value.
  • Use Case: A teacher preparing a competition training booklet can use this Skill to review candidate problems, identify weaknesses, and receive concrete revision suggestions before adoption.

Quick Start

Ask the evaluate-physics-problem skill to assess the quality of the provided physics problem and return a structured evaluation report.

Frequently Asked Questions about evaluate-physics-problem

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate the quality of a physics problem for teaching suitability?

A physics problem evaluation scores correctness, reasoning value, clarity, and difficulty across a 100-point scale. It diagnoses physical consistency, hidden assumptions, and ambiguity risks to determine educational suitability and provide revision recommendations.

What is the best way to score physics exercises for a competition training booklet?

The best way to score competition training physics exercises is a 100-point quantitative scale across seven dimensions with detailed deduction reasons. This method validates physical assumptions and identifies computational burden or ambiguity risks before adopting materials.

Can I use automated assessment to check physical consistency and hidden assumptions in textbook examples?

Automated assessment can check physical consistency and hidden assumptions in textbook examples. It applies structured scoring criteria to diagnose ambiguity risks, computational burden, and educational value, generating concrete revision recommendations for problem selection workflows.

How do I diagnose ambiguity risks and physical assumptions in physics problems?

Diagnosing ambiguity risks and physical assumptions requires validating the problem's physical consistency and computational burden. This generates an issue diagnosis report that highlights weaknesses and provides revision recommendations to improve teaching suitability.

Does problem evaluation work for both basic curriculum exercises and advanced competition training materials?

Problem evaluation works for both basic curriculum exercises and advanced competition training materials. It assesses teaching suitability and design value by applying structured scoring criteria to validate physical assumptions across various educational review scenarios.