evaluating-candidates

Generate candidate evaluation decision packs with scorecards and risk assessments.

5|Updated Jan 19, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill evaluating-candidates
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: evaluating-candidates
Source: https://github.com/oldwinter/skills/tree/main/lenny-skills/evaluating-candidates
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill evaluating-candidates

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) and scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill streamlines the complex process of evaluating job candidates, ensuring hiring decisions are based on concrete evidence rather than subjective impressions, and producing a comprehensive decision pack.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Define Hiring Bar: Establishes clear criteria and what "great" looks like for a role.
  • Evidence-Based Evaluation: Transforms interviews, work samples, and references into measurable signals.
  • Structured Outputs: Generates scorecards, decision memos, and reference check kits.
  • Use Case: When deciding between two strong candidates for a senior engineering role, use this Skill to create a standardized scorecard, design a relevant take-home assignment, and synthesize reference feedback into a clear recommendation with identified risks.

Quick Start

Help me evaluate a candidate for the Senior PM role by creating a scorecard and decision memo based on the provided interview notes and reference feedback.

Frequently Asked Questions about evaluating-candidates

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I make evidence-based hiring decisions instead of relying on subjective impressions?

Evidence-based hiring decisions require structured candidate evaluation using scorecards, work samples, and reference checks to generate measurable signals. This approach synthesizes feedback into a decision-ready recommendation with clear risks and mitigations.

What is the best way to define a hiring bar for a new role?

Defining a hiring bar involves establishing clear criteria and outlining what a great candidate looks like for a specific role. This creates a standardized baseline to evaluate all applicants consistently against job-relevant expectations.

How do I design a paid trial or work sample with a scoring rubric for candidates?

Designing a paid trial requires creating a job-relevant work sample paired with a detailed scoring rubric. This evaluates candidate skills through measurable signals, ensuring assessments are tied directly to actual role requirements.

Can I use this candidate evaluation process for Hiring & Teams roles like a Senior PM?

Yes, the candidate evaluation process supports roles in Hiring & Teams, including Senior PM positions. It generates a comprehensive decision pack containing scorecards, decision memos, and reference check kits tailored to the specific role.

How do I run high-signal reference checks for a final candidate?

High-signal reference checks use structured kits to gather concrete feedback from references. This process transforms subjective reference conversations into measurable signals that feed directly into the final hiring decision memo.

What is a candidate evaluation decision pack and what should it include?

A candidate evaluation decision pack is a comprehensive output that includes hiring bar definitions, scorecards, work sample rubrics, and reference check results. It synthesizes all signals into a recommendation with identified risks and mitigations.