evaluating-llms-harness

Benchmark large language models on academic suites like MMLU and GSM8K.

Updated May 5, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Z43L/zeus-agent --skill evaluating-llms-harness-z43l
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: evaluating-llms-harness
Source: https://github.com/Z43L/zeus-agent/tree/main/skills/mlops/evaluation/lm-evaluation-harness
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Z43L/zeus-agent --skill evaluating-llms-harness-z43l

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill removes the guesswork of evaluating language models by providing a standardized way to benchmark performance across widely used academic tasks, producing comparable results.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Unified LLM benchmarking: Runs a single evaluation workflow across 60+ benchmarks such as MMLU, GSM8K, HumanEval, TruthfulQA, and HellaSwag.
  • Flexible model backends: Supports HuggingFace, vLLM, and API-based models via the harness interfaces.
  • Reproducible reporting: Writes structured outputs (e.g., JSON results) suitable for tracking runs over time and comparing model versions.
  • Use case: When releasing or fine-tuning a model, evaluate against a consistent task suite to track regressions, validate improvements, and report academic-style metrics.

Quick Start

Run MMLU, GSM8K, and HellaSwag for a HuggingFace model using lm-eval on your GPU setup.

Frequently Asked Questions about evaluating-llms-harness

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I benchmark an LLM against standard academic tasks like MMLU and GSM8K?

To benchmark an LLM against MMLU and GSM8K, you use lm-evaluation-harness to select standardized tasks, configure target model arguments, and run evaluations to generate comparable machine-readable metrics.

Can I run LLM evaluation on local HuggingFace models and vLLM backends?

Yes, you can run LLM evaluation on local HuggingFace models and vLLM backends by configuring the target model arguments and device batching within the lm-evaluation-harness framework to produce reproducible results.

What is the best way to compare model quality after fine-tuning a large language model?

The best way to compare model quality after fine-tuning is to benchmark the model against a consistent task suite like TruthfulQA and HellaSwag to track regressions, validate improvements, and report academic-style metrics.

Does lm-evaluation-harness support evaluating API-compatible endpoints?

Yes, lm-evaluation-harness supports evaluating API-compatible endpoints, allowing you to benchmark remote models alongside local HuggingFace and vLLM backends within the same standardized evaluation workflow.

How do I get reproducible results when benchmarking large language models?

You get reproducible results when benchmarking large language models by using lm-evaluation-harness to write structured JSON outputs, which are suitable for tracking runs over time and comparing model versions consistently.