evaluation-framework

Weighted scoring combines multiple criteria with assigned weights to produce a total score. Define your criteria, assign weights to each, score artifacts against them, calculate the weighted total, and apply thresholds to map results to decisions. This framework works across code review, documentation, and risk assessment domains.

Yes. Threshold-based decision rules automatically map scores to pass/fail or accept/reject outcomes. Configure score ranges and assign decisions to each range, enabling automated quality gates without manual review at each step.

Assign weights to each criterion to reflect its importance. Higher weights increase a criterion's contribution to the final score. Define criteria and weights in YAML configuration, then apply them consistently across evaluations to ensure criteria with greater priority drive decisions.

The framework is domain-agnostic. Configure different criteria sets and thresholds for each domain—code review, documentation quality, knowledge intake, or risk assessment—then apply the same weighted scoring and threshold logic to all. Separate configuration from logic for portability.

The framework maps scores to decisions and supports integration with domain-specific rubrics and tooling. Export scores and decisions to downstream systems for reporting, automation, or further analysis in your existing workflow.