evaluative-action

Evaluating an artifact against criteria means systematically checking whether it meets defined standards. Provide the artifact and your criteria; the evaluation produces a structured assessment table with evidence, a pass/partial/fail verdict for each criterion, and an overall compliance judgment.

Document assessments by recording the artifact being reviewed, explicit criteria applied, evidence supporting each judgment, and a clear overall verdict. This structured approach ensures audits and reviews are objective, traceable, and defensible.

Yes. Criteria-based evaluation applies across products, processes, and documents. Whether assessing readiness, quality, or compliance, you define standards and the evaluation produces an evidence table and verdict showing what meets requirements and where gaps exist.

The evaluation process works with explicit or implied criteria. If criteria aren't explicitly stated, the Skill can work with assumed standards based on context. You'll still receive an assessment table and overall verdict with clear justification.

An evaluation returns the target artifact, criteria applied, an assessment table showing evidence for each criterion, an overall verdict, and identified gaps where the artifact falls short of requirements.