evanflow-review

Review pull requests with structured feedback and verification steps.

417|18|Updated Apr 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/evanklem/evanflow --skill evanflow-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: evanflow-review
Source: https://github.com/evanklem/evanflow/tree/main/skills/evanflow-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/evanklem/evanflow --skill evanflow-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Code reviews often suffer from ambiguity and inconsistent feedback. This skill provides a structured approach to requesting and processing reviews, ensuring feedback is clear and aligned with the changes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured Review Workflow: Guide for requesting feedback, framing goals, and identifying risk areas.
  • Verification-Oriented: Encourages running local checks, re-reading diffs, and confirming changes meet the plan before approval.
  • Hand-offs & Governance: Clear hand-offs for architecture or debugging issues and documented acceptance criteria.

Quick Start

Review a recent PR by outlining goals, risks, and verification steps in your request.

Frequently Asked Questions about evanflow-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I structure a code review to ensure actionable feedback on a pull request?

To perform a structured code review, outline your PR goals, identify risk areas, and define verification steps like running local quality checks and re-reading diffs. This ensures feedback is clear and aligned with the changes.

What is the best way to process feedback from reviewers on a completed pull request?

Processing reviewer feedback involves re-reading diffs against the original plan and surfacing open questions to guide next actions. This verification workflow ensures reviewer comments are systematically addressed before approval.

How do I enforce verification steps before approving changes in a pull request?

You can enforce verification by requiring local quality checks to pass, re-reading diffs against the planned changes, and documenting acceptance criteria. This structured approach guarantees work meets the plan before final approval.

How do I handle architecture or debugging issues discovered during a PR review?

During a PR review, handle architecture or debugging issues by creating clear hand-offs. Documenting these separately ensures proper governance and keeps the current code review focused on immediate changes.

What should be included when requesting feedback on code changes?

When requesting feedback on code changes, include your goals, identified risk areas, and verification steps. Framing the request with these elements provides reviewers with the context needed for a structured code review.