What problem does it solve? Event organizers are often pushed to run 1:1 meeting programs or promise sponsors a number of guaranteed meetings without a defensible way to decide whether the program should exist, how matches are made, what can honestly be promised, or how no-shows are absorbed. This Skill provides ranked decision menus for each of those choices, grounded in consent and measured data rather than vendor benchmarks. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Run-or-not gate: Decides whether a meeting program should exist at all, based on whether a signed package names a meeting number or two populations were deliberately invited to meet. - Matching and scheduling menus: Ranks five matching mechanisms (no program, mutual opt-in, open directory, scored ranking, organizer brokering) and four scheduling mechanics across effort, value, compliance, and efficiency axes. - Quota commitment posture: Shapes what a sponsor package may honestly promise, from no promise to a guaranteed count with verifiable criteria and a fundable make-good. - No-show handling and measurement: Chooses among reconfirm-and-remind, standby refill, doing nothing, and conditional overbooking, with self-measured counting rules for held-versus-booked reporting. - Use Case: A sponsor offers $25,000 if the prospectus prints "20 guaranteed meetings with senior platform engineers." The Skill refuses the bare number, shapes a guaranteed count with evidenced criteria and a defined make-good, and routes clause drafting to the sponsor-agreement skill. ## Quick Start Ask the Skill whether your event should run a 1:1 meeting program and how to structure matching, booking, quota commitments, and no-show handling for it.
