What problem does it solve? Building event sourcing infrastructure requires choosing the right storage technology, designing append-only schemas, and implementing optimistic concurrency, subscriptions, and idempotency correctly—mistakes here cause data corruption and scaling pain. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Technology Selection Guidance: Compare EventStoreDB, PostgreSQL, Kafka, DynamoDB, and Marten against your throughput, query, and ecosystem constraints. - Ready-to-Use Templates: PostgreSQL schema DDL, a Python asyncpg event store with optimistic concurrency and subscription checkpoints, EventStoreDB client usage, and a DynamoDB single-table design. - Best Practices Checklist: Stream naming, correlation/causation IDs, event versioning, idempotent writes, and indexing strategies. - Use Case: You are building an order management system with event sourcing and need to decide between PostgreSQL and EventStoreDB, then implement append, stream reads, and global subscriptions with checkpointing. ## Quick Start Ask the agent to design an event store schema and implementation for your aggregate using PostgreSQL or EventStoreDB.