eventmodeling-identifying-inputs

Map UI actions and processor triggers to domain roles and events.

10|2|Updated Feb 9, 2026

Search Tags:#automation #workflow #architecture #commands #domain-driven-design #eventmodeling

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/TrogonStack/agentskills --skill eventmodeling-identifying-inputs

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: eventmodeling-identifying-inputs
Source: https://github.com/TrogonStack/agentskills/tree/main/plugins/trogonstack-eventmodeling/skills/eventmodeling-identifying-inputs
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/TrogonStack/agentskills --skill eventmodeling-identifying-inputs

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill resolves ambiguity in event modeling by clearly distinguishing between user-initiated UI actions and processor-automated system triggers, ensuring accurate role attribution and system traceability.

Core Features & Use Cases

Command Attribution: Maps every system command to a specific role or actor, preventing generic or undefined input sources.
Processor Logic Modeling: Documents the reactive nature of processors, including todo-list patterns and event-driven automation.
Use Case: Use this during the design phase of a complex system to ensure that every button click and background webhook is accounted for, validated, and mapped to the correct domain event.

Quick Start

Use the eventmodeling-identifying-inputs skill to analyze the current storyboard and generate a comprehensive command catalog with role attributions.

Frequently Asked Questions about eventmodeling-identifying-inputs

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I map UI actions to domain commands in event modeling?▼

To map UI actions to domain commands in event modeling, you catalog user interactions by attributing each system command to a specific role or actor. This ensures accurate traceability between user inputs and the resulting domain event stream.

What is the difference between user-initiated UI actions and processor triggers in event modeling?▼

User-initiated UI actions are direct interactions mapped to specific roles, while processor triggers are reactive, event-driven automations. Distinguishing them in event modeling resolves ambiguity by ensuring accurate role attribution and system traceability for background webhooks.

How do I validate preconditions for domain commands during system design?▼

To validate preconditions for domain commands, you define the state-based context and input validation rules during the transition from storyboarding to technical specification. This ensures every system command is validated before generating a domain event.

Can I use event modeling for processor logic modeling and todo-list automation patterns?▼

Yes, event modeling supports processor logic modeling by documenting the reactive nature of processors, including todo-list patterns and event-driven automation. This ensures background webhooks and automated system processes are fully accounted for in the command catalog.

When should I catalog system commands using domain-driven design?▼

You should catalog system commands using domain-driven design during the design phase of a complex system. This ensures every button click and background webhook is accounted for, validated, and mapped to the correct domain event.

Why does my event modeling storyboard lack traceability between user interactions and domain events?▼

Your event modeling storyboard lacks traceability because system commands are not properly attributed to specific roles or actors. Mapping UI actions and processor triggers to specific domain roles and events establishes complete traceability across the system.